There's a stark difference between a commission agent and a true advisor, one that the client ultimately notices. It's not about the effort, but the approach. The commission agent does the bare minimum to get the deal signed, while the advisor takes the necessary steps to ensure that signing is a sound decision.
That difference is evident from the very first meeting. The advisor has a thorough understanding of what they're offering, knows the fine print inside and out, and therefore explains it clearly. They understand the financial capacity of the person they're meeting with and help them choose a property they can afford, even if that means recommending another project that better suits their budget and needs.
He gets involved because he knows that this person is making one of the most important economic decisions of their life and that his judgment can make the difference between a peaceful purchase and a financial burden for years.
The commission agent, on the other hand, isn't even capable of doing the most basic things. When they get a client, they call the construction company, and it's the construction company that presents the project, prepares the payment plan, and often even closes the sale. Their contribution ends up being just taking the client to the door, and even then, they collect a commission as if they had managed the entire transaction.
The gap widens after the signing. For the sales agent, the sale ends when the deal closes and the client ceases to exist. Calls are no longer answered as quickly, questions about the progress of the work go unanswered, and the client who placed their trust suddenly feels alone with a company they don't know. The advisor understands that the closing is just the beginning of the relationship and, therefore, accompanies the client throughout the entire process, right up to the handover of the keys.
The construction company also bears some responsibility here. When it rewards only sales volume and doesn't ask how each deal was closed or how the customer is treated afterward, it ends up reinforcing the commission agent's bad practices.
Every customer left to fend for themselves associates their bad experience with the project's brand, not with the person who served them. That bill is paid by the company, not the intermediary.
Therefore, the commission, which is legitimate, should be the result of a job well done and not payment for opening a door. Those who truly choose to advise discover something no commission agent ever understands: a client who is well-guided returns and recommends others. And that trust can't be bought with any advertising campaign.
You may be interested in:
